Leisure-Time, Bodily Activity and Threat of Variety 2 Diabetic issues


Research Technique

The current study was done as a sub-research of the Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Wellbeing (J-ECOH) Research, an ongoing, massive-scale examine amongst personnel in a number of organizations.[24,25] The J-ECOH Study was introduced in every single company by making use of posters, and personnel ended up specified an option to refuse the use of their details for research, in accordance to the Japanese Ethical Tips for Epidemiological Exploration. The examine protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Nationwide Center for International Health and Medication, Japan.

Of the participating businesses in the J-ECOH Examine, the present examination incorporated knowledge from one particular business (an electrical machinery and apparatus manufacturing) where element facts on bodily exercise has been gathered as a part of periodic overall health test-ups considering the fact that 2006.


In Japan, workers are obliged to go through wellness checkup at least as soon as a 12 months below the Industrial Basic safety and Overall health Act. A full of 40,948 personnel (34,700 adult males and 6,248 girls) aged 30 to 64 years been given overall health examine-ups amongst April 2006 and March 2007 (baseline time period). Of these men and women, 11,434 personnel were excluded owing to lack of facts on the variables necessary to diagnose diabetes (n = 7,655), acquiring a historical past of diabetes (defined applying HbA 1c, fasting or random plasma glucose, a health-related historical past of diabetes, or at the moment getting treatment for diabetes) (n = 3,376). Workers have been also excluded if they having a heritage of most cancers, cardiovascular disorder, or stroke (n = 766). We excluded an extra 2,964 workers due to lack of info on publicity or covariates (n = 2,515) as perfectly as engagement in only unspecified leisure exercise (named “Other”) (n = 487). Some of the individuals achieved a person or more of the exclusion criteria. Eventually, we excluded 1,303 individuals who did not show up at any subsequent overall health verify-up or who did not have facts on HbA 1c or blood glucose in a subsequent wellness evaluation, which remaining 26,628 workers (23,207 guys and 3,421 women) aged 30 to 64 years for inclusion in our research.

General Health and fitness Evaluation

Entire body height was measured to the closest .1 cm and human body bodyweight to the closest .1 kg. BMI was calculated as pounds in kilograms divided by squared peak in meters. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures ended up assessed employing an oscillometric method with an automatic sphygmomanometer (BP-203RV III Colin, Tokyo, Japan) in a sitting down position just after a 5 min rest. The history of sickness, do the job-associated variables, and overall health-linked life-style things, such as bodily activity, alcoholic beverages consumption, and rest length, had been gathered applying a common questionnaire. Biochemical measurements involved plasma glucose and HbA 1c . The blood glucose concentrations ended up identified making use of the glucose electrode system. HbA 1c was measured with an HPLC technique. HbA 1c was assessed according to a common technique used by the Japan Diabetic issues Modern society. We converted the HbA 1c measurements to the Nationwide Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program equal value (%) working with the method: HbA1c(%) = 1:02 × HbA1c (Japan Diabetic issues Modern society)(%) + :25 %.[26]

Physical Exercise Questionnaire

Members had been asked if they ended up on a regular basis engaging in any bodily action for the duration of their leisure time. If they engaged in bodily action, they were also questioned to choose up to 3 things to do amongst a checklist of 20 actions and explain the frequency (situations for every month) as perfectly as the length (minutes) for each individual activity. If members had been engaged in functions that were not outlined in the questionnaire, they were instructed to decide on an activity of related depth from the record.

Of the 20 typical exercise or sports things to do, a single action, “Other,” was not applied for even further investigation. The benefit of metabolic equivalents (METs) for just about every activity was assigned according to a compendium of physical things to do.[27] If the Achieved value of an activity was not mentioned in the compendium, we assigned a Achieved benefit from a very similar exercise. Of the 19 pursuits, 13 (walking not for function or commuting, walking fast not for get the job done or commuting, swimming, golf follow, golfing, baseball, softball, bicycle biking, desk tennis, pang pong, badminton, muscle mass power schooling, and radio gymnastics) have been classified as reasonable things to do (3 to 6 METs) and 6 (gentle jogging [approximately 6 min/km], jogging, soccer, tennis, aerobics, and bounce rope) were being categorised as vigorous routines (>6 METs), and these things to do were used to calculate the weekly Fulfilled-hrs of leisure-time exercise by multiplying the METs, length, and frequency of the action. These activities included the most of typical functions in Japan.[28] Next the physical exercise suggestions, the members were being categorized into 4 teams in accordance to the dose of leisure-time work out per 7 days: inactive ( Met-hours), lower (.1 to <7.5 MET-hours), medium (7.5 to <15.0 MET-hours), and high (≥15.0 MET-hours).[7,8] These cutoff points were used in previous studies.[18,29] Individuals in each category of leisure-time exercise dose were further divided into the following three groups: individuals who engaged in moderate-intensity exercise alone, vigorous-intensity exercise alone, and both moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise.

Occupational physical activity was assessed by a single question with four response options (mostly sedentary, mostly standing, walking often, or fairly active). Duration of walking for commuting to and from work (min per day) was self-reported.

Assessment of Other Variables

The information on smoking, alcohol consumption, sleep duration, shift work, and a family history of diabetes was collected using a standard questionnaire during the health check-ups. Smoking status (never, past, or current) and, if the individual was a smoker, the number of cigarettes smoked per day were also ascertained during the health check-ups. The total amount of alcohol consumption for each individual was calculated using the data on the frequency (number of days per week) and amount of consumption of common alcoholic beverages (Japanese sake, beer, whiskey, shochu, chuhai, and wine) per day, which was indicated by an equivalent amount of one unit (go) of Japanese sake. One go of Japanese sake contains approximately 23 g of ethanol.

Assessment of Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes was identified using data from the annual health check-ups for a maximum of 6 years after the baseline examination. Diabetes was defined as HbA 1c ≥6.5 % (48 mmol/mol), fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), random plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l), or currently under medical treatment for diabetes. Individuals without diabetes at baseline who met any of the above conditions in the subsequent check-ups were considered to have an incident case of type 2 diabetes.

Statistical Analysis

The descriptive results of study population are expressed as the mean for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. The differences across the dose of leisure-time physical activity were tested by using linear regression for continuous variables and logistic regression for categorical variables.

Person-time was calculated from the date of the baseline examination to the date of diagnosis with diabetes at a subsequent examination or to the date of the last examination, whichever came first. The HR and the 95 % CI for the incidence of diabetes associated with leisure-time exercise, occupational physical activity, and walking to and from work were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards models. First, we adjusted for age (years, continuous) and sex (model 1). Then, model 2 was further adjusted for shift work (yes or no), smoking status (non-smoker, current smoker consuming 1 to 10, 11–20, or ≥21 cigarettes per day), alcohol consumption (non-drinker, drinker consuming <1, 1 to <2, ≥2 go of Japanese sake equivalent per day [1 go of Japanese sake contains approximately 23 g of ethanol]), sleep duration (<5, 5 to <6, 6 to <7, or ≥7 h per day), hypertension (yes or no, defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, a diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or currently taking medication for hypertension), a family history of diabetes (yes or no), and other two types of physical activity. That is, occupational physical activity (mostly sedentary, mostly standing, walking often, or fairly active) and commuting physical activity (<20, 20 to <40, or ≥40 min of walking for commuting to and from work) were adjusted for leisure-time exercise, leisure-time exercise and commuting physical activity were adjusted for occupational physical activity, and leisure-time exercise and occupational physical activity were adjusted for commuting physical activity. In model 3, BMI (kg/m 2, continuous) was adjusted for.

Trends in the association between physical activity and diabetes risk were assessed by determining the median value in each category of leisure-time physical activity. The lowest category of each activity was considered as a reference. For combined associations of the dose and intensity of leisure-time physical activity, participants who did not engage in leisure-time exercise were references for our analyses. We repeated the analysis for dose of moderate-intensity exercise and vigorous-intensity exercise, respectively. In addition, we conducted analysis for each specific type of leisure-time exercise and risk of diabetes participants were classified as those who engaged in specific activity or not. We tested the proportional-hazards assumption with the Schoenfeld residuals. We found no significant deviations for all of the covariates, except for smoking and occupational physical activity. As a sensitivity analysis, we excluded participants with a follow-up period of less than three years. Two-sided P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were performed with Stata version 13.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas).